![]() Footnote 2 Mark had the misfortune to be caught up in this transition. Yet in today’s journals, the topic is nearly forgotten, and few students seek out courses in the subject. During the time of Alfred Marshall, for instance, no scholar could be considered respectable without demonstrating a reasonable understanding of earlier writings. It has attracted great scholars, including Schumpeter, Viner, and Robbins, among many others. But this in no way reduces the significance of their earlier work.Īs a field of study, the history of economic ideas occupies a curious position. ![]() Both shifted their interests over the years and subsequently made significant contributions in new arenas. ![]() Here I am driven to disagree with Mark, as I did with Hicks. Footnote 1 In later years, Mark came to regard this as one of his less significant contributions-much as Hicks eventually viewed his Value and Capital. ![]() Ironically, as Mark himself recognized, perhaps his most remembered work is his Economic Theory in Retrospect ( 1962), a book translated into an impressive array of languages. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |